I'm old enough to remember when answering machines were new. I'm old enough to remember that at first they used tapes to record the messages, ingoing and outgoing. I'm old enough to remember commercials for funny outgoing message tapes. One of them was called "Crazy Calls," and I can still sing about 4 of the different outgoing message options on it. There was the Beethoven's 5th one ("Nobody's home...nobody's home"). There was the hip hop one ("You've gotta leave your name, you've gotta leave your number. Wait for the beep."). There was the Andrews sisters one ("Hey I'm very sorry, but I'm not at home, but when I get the message on the telephone you'll be the first one my our list").
I just got curious, so I googled it. Sure enough...
And SUPER DUPER BONUS! If you want to record one of these on your voicemail, you can now find the entire Crazy Calls tape on youtube. It includes completely irrelevant instructions for how to get this on your answering machine, just in case you need them.
There's also a second volume, if you're interested. [Editor's note: The fact that this is available on Youtube feels like almost as big a waste of electrons as its existence in my head feels like a waste of neurons. My first question to God: why don't we have a "purge" button for our brain?]
In his Mission Statement, Jerry Maguire (yeah, I'm still on that) talks about his dad, who started a phone answering business only to be put out of business by the answering machine. He points out that within three years answering machines were in everyone's home, but not until they figured out how to personalize them. No doubt he was thinking of Crazy Calls when he wrote that.
The Things We Think and Do Not Say:
The machine was a part of life, but only when everyone learned to personalize it.
He goes on to talk about the way that sports had become a machine...that Sports would never be "the Pute and simple thing that older men pine for." He says everyone knows it. Players, owners, fans. "The machine has moved into our homes." And he asks the question: "How do we personalize that machine?"
His argument is that his company has lost its passion in the interest of generating more money, entering into a cycle of attempting to maintain success. The entrance into that cycle itself leads to eventual failure as the life-giving passion wanes. He says that at their moment of greatest success, the great ones all do one thing: they raise the bar, working harder and smarter to raise the bar. It's that commitment to their passion that powers them to even greater heights.
I've been a part of churches in all different parts of their growth cycles. As I mentioned last week, I've seen the very end. But I've also been there for what I still believe was a promising beginning. Not a new start as much as a rebirth. I was so proud to be a part of a congregation that use the memory of what was to empower the new rather than constrain it, understanding that future success rarely looks like past success.
Jerry's question is really about measuring success. Do we measure it by the number of clients and the number of dollars, or is there some other way to measure it...one that takes into account the passion that drove them to agency in the first place. He doesn't answer that question just yet.
I'm convinced "measuring success" is the root of all evil. It's not that we don't need to evaluate. We do. It's just that so often the measures of success become more important than what we are measuring. Do we care more about education or test scores? You desperately want to say "education," but that's simply not true. The overwhelming truth is that our society cares far more about test scores than it does education. That's why "teaching to the test" is a thing, and it's tragic.
I get it. Evaluating real success is HARD. Maybe impossible. Because subjective evaluation is messy, and objective evaluation is at best imprecise but more often worthless. You can tell me I'm crazy, and you may be right. I may be crazy. [Editor's note: but it just may be a lunatic you're looking for.] After all, if a company needs widgets packed, evaluating the widget packers by the number of widgets they can pack seems reasonable. But it ignores what makes someone a good widget packer in the first place: a passion for packing widgets.
So now I have a question. How do we measure the success of a church? Nearly every church leadership meeting I've attended where this comes up has wound up in the same place. They want metrics. Dollars in the plates and butts in the seats. More dollars? More better. Fewer butts in the seats? The director's in the hot seat. The result is that we, as a church, start chasing after numbers. I was guilty of this in my first full time music director job. I made it all about the numbers until my choir president very politely told me how off-putting it was and that I really needed to knock it off.
[Side note. That can lead to some really funny things. I once saw a worship counting form that had a space for the numbers as well as a space to note the weather and any other factors that may have depressed attendance. "Well, our attendance was down last week, but to be fair the temperature was 10 degrees below optimal, and there were scattered clouds which may have led people to believe rain was coming prior to the end of church." WHAT?! People will sleep overnight in front of a store to get a good price on a TV. Don't tell me what we're offering isn't important enough to put on a jacket.]
The thing is, numbers can be a symptom of success in church. If people find value in church, they might support it with their money and will share it with their friends like they share apple pie recipes (leading to better attendance). But they might not do those things. And Jesus didn't tell us to serve only people who will pay or will serve as our megaphone to the world.
I don't know the right answer to this question, or even if there is a right answer. Honestly I do pay attention to the numbers. But I'm very cautious not to strive for them. Every day, I try to build relationships with people and between people, connecting them with a family that offers both comfort and care when they need it as well as an opportunity to offer comfort and care to others.
Maybe the way to measure evaluate success in ministry is in terms of the journey we are on together. How many "miles" have we walked together? What have we done together that's worth anything? What has caused us to stumble along the way? How did we grow from it? How well did we put aside our differences--or better yet use them--to have a positive impact on the world?
How would you evaluate success in ministry? Leave your answer in the comments.